Monday, June 8, 2020

Protecting ourselves from unhealthy connections


While some may disagree, it is my position that it matters who we are connected to emotionally, mentally, physically and spiritually in our everyday lives.

When online

In this current time, we find ourselves at a place where we are unable to physically gather for worship services at our churches, gurdwaras, mosques and temples.  In this current time, we find ourselves dealing with the Coronavirus global pandemic.  We have been instructed to Shelter-In-Place and only leave our homes for "essential" items (i.e. food, water etc.) in order to minimize the spread of what medical authorities are calling a "novel virus."  Not only have many religious services transitioned to online platforms as a result of an unprecedented time, we have transitioned everyday activities such as: schooling, working out and gathering for work meetings to online platforms as well.  

As a result of increased time online, some contend that publicly exposing hard facts surrounding the murders of #AhmaudArbery, #BreonnaTaylor and #GeorgeFloyd would not have made global headlines and sparked a social-justice movement in the streets, had we not been under this particular set of circumstances.  Beloved community, I urge you, that while online, to be sure that you are severing any unhealthy connections.  This might look like, people on social media platforms “blacking out” their profile pictures this week to demonstrate solidarity with the #BlackLivesMatter movement, but having said something racist on their timeline last week. Delete them. This might look like people sending messages into your inbox wanting to engage in a debate with you that it should be “All Lives Matter” as opposed to “Black Lives Matter.”  Block them. You are under no obligation, as a black person in America to defend the value of your black life – online or in person.
          
                                                                    Photo courtesy of: Google.com 
 
Others say that you should maintain unhealthy connections on your timeline so that you, "Know who you are dealing with."  Some say that we should be posting and re-posting images and videos of black people being brutalized and killed at the hands of law enforcement in the name of "raising awareness." I disagree on both points.  We are under no obligation, as black people to take on the labor of studying and/or educating white people worldwide, at the cost of ourselves.  It is 2020, white people and non-black people need to study and educate themselves about racism in all of its forms!  Who we are connected to online, matters.
 
                                                                     Photo courtesy of: Google.com
 
When in-person

Next, there are some ministers that in order to live stream their services, had to come into the church building to preach and post their sermons.  However, other faith leaders are having people come into the building and lead worship for their live streamed services, during a global pandemic, not standing 6-feet-apart.  This is a problem.  We have to use wisdom when medical issues arise, especially at the pandemic level.  In these troubling times, there were pastors that still decided to have in-person church services exceeding the allotted amount of people, because they "did not believe that the virus was real," or believed that if they were taking any precautions that they somehow "did not have strong enough faith in God." This is also problematic, and I want to challenge these kinds of notions. Jesus being a miracle worker does not mean we ignore the advice of medical professionals.  It seems that millennials have been trying to communicate something before the virus, but it has become even clearer now:  sometimes, we have unhealthy connections to our faith communities.  We must remember that the church, gurdwara, mosque and temple is bigger than the building, meaning that ministry and fellowship with the Divine is not limited to the four walls.  Connecting online for worship during a global pandemic is a healthy practice.  Please remember that, you are under no obligation as a person of faith to compromise your own health and safety in the name of praising the Lord.  

After we remove ourselves from unhealthy online connections and then unhealthy in-person connections when it comes to our faith communities, we can find safe ways to fellowship during these unprecedented times.  We can free ourselves to engage in activities such as: yoga, meditation, reading, walking or other physical exercise, listening to sermons, podcasts or inspirational speeches, and creating art etc.   All of these are methods of connecting with and offering worship to God in healthy ways.  Who we are connected to in-person matters.

                                                                     Photo courtesy of: Google.com 

When in government
 
Lastly, when we have government officials categorizing all Black Lives Matter protesters as “looters” and encouraging police to enact violence upon protesters, this is highly questionable to say the least.  When Donald Trump asserts, “There could have been something that happened that wasn’t captured in the video” when referring to Arbery’s unjust murder, these kinds of statements can add more trauma or stress to already stressful situations.  For example, we are stuck inside, we are unable to physically attend houses of worship in the community of our faith tradition, we are wanting to engage in a social-justice movement by protesting in the streets, all while ingesting hate-filled speech from the President of the United States.

                                                                    Photo courtesy of: Google.com  

Beloved community, while it may be harder to sever unhealthy connections with governmental officials because you want to keep up with the news during these political times, maybe limit your news intake in the course of a day (take a break from reading the headlines), take a break from arguments in online posts/comment sections (give your Twitter fingers a rest), unplug (log out of all social-media accounts) for 3 days at at time, and replace time spent online with finding things that bring you joy.  If you decide to stay online, block videos on your timeline of black people being brutalized and murdered, instead of sharing them. Don’t feel pressured to keep contributing to our collective trauma as black people in America and abroad. How we engage our government, matters.  Remember to tend to your emotional, mental, physical and spiritual health during these troubling times.  Remember that time, Jesus found a way to rest during a storm?  The scripture reads: "A furious squall came up, and the waves broke over the boat, so that it was nearly swamped. Jesus was in the stern, sleeping on a cushion" (Mark 4:38, NASB).  I invite us to do the same. To rest in the midst of this tumultuous storm.
 
                                                                     Photo courtesy of: Twitter (@TheNapMinistry) 

But before we can rest, we must cut unhealthy ties.  After we sever unhealthy connections from our everyday lives, in the words of @NapMinistry, we must remember that: "Rest is part of our resistance."  Jesus invites us to take a break, with these words: "Come to Me, all who are weary and heavy-laden, and I will give you rest" (Matthew 11:28, NASB).  As the Gospel song goes, "There’s an army rising up. To break every chain."  There is a social-justice movement happening right before our eyes.  But before we get on the front lines of this current political movement, we must take a personal moment of rest.


#WholyGroundSpiritualCenter #WholisticFaith #BlackLivesMatter #COVID19 #Race #SocialJustice #RestAsResistance #TheNapMinistry #AhmaudArbery #BreonnaTaylor #GeorgeFloyd 

Thursday, January 30, 2020

Dear Stanford, what about MLK?




      “Action expresses priorities.”  This quote comes from nonviolent leader, Mohandas Gandhi.  This past Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, as I read a “San Jose Mercury News” article entitled: “At Stanford, King’s legacy lives in what was supposed to be its temporary home,” by Lisa M. Krieger (https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/01/20/at-stanford-kings-legacy-lives-in-what-was-supposed-to-be-its-temporary-home/), I realized that Gandhi’s words still ring true.  Dr. Clayborne Carson, History Professor at Stanford University and Director of The Martin Luther King Jr., Research and Education Institute and The Martin Luther King Papers Project (since 1985), is interviewed in the article.
  
Photo credit: kinginstitute.stanford.edu

The mission of “The Papers Project” is this: “To publish the definitive fourteen-volume edition of The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr., a comprehensive collection of King's most significant correspondence, sermons, speeches, published writings, and unpublished manuscripts.”  As I did a little more research, I learned that “The Papers Project” is not only an arm of the The King Center, in Atlanta, Georgia, but that the late Coretta Scott King, personally invited Dr. Carson to lead the initiative (https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/king-papers/about-papers-project)!  In short, the Mercury news article documents the anxiety that Dr. Carson feels (with his own retirement on the horizon) in wondering what will become of the Project.  Simply stated, “The Papers Project” has been “temporarily” housed in a portable on Stanford University’s campus, for the past 34 years.  I am in agreement with Dr. Carson, that “King’s legacy deserves better.”
Photo credit: SCOPE2035 (Student protest signs, February 2018)

Photo credit: Google.com
As I began to process this reality, I came to realize that the current state of affairs regarding “The Papers Project” perpetuates racial inequality as it pertains to access of university resources. Therefore, it is undoubtedly a looming example of both structural and institutional racism, in the United States, no matter how subtle.  I find it hard to believe that I would be writing this article if a white male were the subject of conversation.  And yet, just two months earlier, Stanford withdrew its application for a 17-year expansion plan, the largest proposed development in the history of Santa Clara County.  I submit that if a university has the financial means to expand its campus at this magnitude, it certainly has the resources to properly house The Martin Luther King, Jr. Papers Project.  In fact, “The Papers Project” has been in existence double the amount of years that it would have taken Stanford to expand their campus, had the university not withdrawn its development application this past November.  This fact alone is most certainly appalling, to say the least! 

In summary, Stanford proposed to build 550 units of on-campus housing with an estimated 9,500 person increase in its student population.  However, student advocacy groups such as Stanford Coalition for Planning an Equitable (SCOPE) 2035 (https://scope2035.weebly.com/), aimed to push the university to not only increase the number of student housing units within its development application, but to also contribute their “fair share” of housing to largely overlooked populations in the housing discussion such as Stanford’s service workers and some of the most vulnerable populations in surrounding cities in the region (such as East Palo Alto residents) – who would no doubt be displaced, had this 3.5 million square foot project received a green light from the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors.  


Photo credit: SCOPE2035 (Student activist speaking to Palo Alto City Council January 2019, about Stanford's proposed expansion and its housing impacts)

As I expanded my research on “The Papers Project” being “temporarily” housed in a portable on Stanford’s campus, I realized that there was a link between this situation and the university withdrawing its application for a 17-year expansion plan.  I realized that at the crux of both of these issues was/is Stanford’s unwillingness to build sufficient housing, much less its unwillingness to prioritize the needs of the most vulnerable populations within their reach.  
Photo credit: SCOPE2035 (Student protester)



For this reason, I submit that perhaps Stanford can currently ignore the needs of the marginalized people which King fought for (like service workers and historically disenfranchised communities), because for decades, they have ignored the legacy of Dr. King, himself. If one does not honor a leader of marginalized people, he or she will not honor marginalized communities—for they are one and the same.  The reason that the building where “The Papers Project” is located can sit neglected for 34 years, is because it is indicative of the university’s priorities.  Dear Stanford, Dr. King needs adequate and dignified housing, now. And so do the communities for which he fought.


With urgency,


Kyra Brown, M.Div., East Palo Alto

#SCOPE2035 #EastPaloAlto #HousingCrisis #StanfordUniversity #MLKPapersProject #KingInstitute

Sunday, May 19, 2019

Oakland's #510Day highlights displacement


Nita Bee and Leon Sykes are two community organizers from Oakland who planned #510Day in May. The goal of the gathering was three-fold: to stand up against displacement, to celebrate Oakland’s history and culture and to foster a sense of pride. We spoke about a week after the event. Here is what they had to say:


Flyer: Courtesy of @510Day

Q (uestion): What inspired you to start #510Day and what did you hope to achieve?

Leon: #415Day -- an event put on by people born and raised in San Francisco, meaning long-term residents. It was a celebration of a working-class community of color and its rich culture.

Nita: We started #510Day in 2016. I saw it as an opportunity to send a message. At one point, signs were being put up around Lake Merritt stating that groups of people (of 12 or more) could not assemble at the lake without a permit -- even though it was public space! The first year, 200 people showed up. This year, at least 1,500.

Q: I understand that an Anti-Displacement March was part of this event, can you tell me more about that?

Leon: The march was fully the youth's idea! We adults supported, but the youth brought out 150 young people and came up with the hashtag: #WeStillHere. Meaning, we still congregate and we are still a driving force in the culture of Oakland. The culture here is full of black folks, Latinx folks, Asian folks.

Nita: And Oakland has a huge population of Native American folks! My teenage daughter was involved in organizing the march. Four organizations were also involved: Urban Peace Movement, Communities United for Restorative Youth Justice, United Roots and an Asian and Pacific Islander grassroots organization: AYPAL.

Q: Did you have other hashtags for this event? Did you intend to make it go viral?

Leon: The other hashtags were: #OaklandAgainstGentrification and #TownBizness. A lot of media coverage that the event received was because of the whole #BBQBecky incident at Lake Merritt last summer. A white woman called the Oakland police (in tears) because two black men were simply having a barbecue (#BBQnWhileBlack). I would say that the incident proved why #510Day is necessary. At the end of the day, it was the youth who put on for their city!

Nita: The work that the youth did in organizing this Anti-displacement March is something that will be a driving force (politically) for the years to come [smile]!


Photo: @The.Root

Q: What are some of the housing struggles that residents are facing here in Oakland? Have you encountered housing policy issues at the city government level when trying to organize and address housing struggles? 

Nita: Illegal evictions happen, here. But many people don't realize that as tenants they have rights or either they lack the resources to fight eviction cases. There are also no regulations in place (rent control) to keep the rents affordable for working class people of color. Or to take it a step further, when developers come to town, they aren't mandated to have a certain percentage of low-income units in a given project -- or if they do, they can buy their way out of it. Also, many people that did buy their homes lost them due to predatory lending. So there are a lot of policy issues.  

Leon: Oakland has a Rent Board. I have gone to some of their meetings. But where they were receiving 2-3 cases a year regarding illegal evictions, they are now receiving 100 or more cases per year. This means that by the time many of these cases are able to addressed, families have already been displaced. Also, many jobs in Oakland don't provide a living wage which means that even with a full-time job, many people still can't afford to pay the high cost of rent. Gentrification is an attack on working-class people. This is why I say, gentrification is violence.

Q: What advice would you give to Bay Area communities, like East Palo Alto, daily facing the threat of displacement?

Nita: Don't move. Don't sell your land. Land is life. Take up space.

Leon: First, I want to clarify something. We are anti-gentrification, not anti-new-to-Oakland. There’s a difference. Advice? I’d say, there's strength in numbers. It’s the Warriors’ motto [smile], it’s very important to remember and it’s vital to our existence. Keep organizing. We from the Bay (Area) and the radical is in us! We have to remind folks that #WeStillHere in EPA! We have to remember who we are.

#SanFrancisco #Oakland #EastPaloAlto #HousingCrisis #AffordableHousing #StopDisplacement #DisplacedLane #DevelopmentWithoutDisplacement #SiliconValley #Gentrification #WeStillHere #StrengthInNumbers